|
|
Welcome
to George Eby's ColdCure.com!
Click below to order the only product ever found to
cure the common cold. Over the years, George Eby has become
the world's leading authority on curing common colds with zinc according to this
eTBLAST independent
analysis. He pioneered the subject with his breakthrough
1984 research. In 2008, significant confirmation resulted with the
publication of this report
which showed that common colds were shortened and symptoms improved and most
importantly, InterCellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (ICAM-1) was inhibited by zinc
lozenges. Inhibition of ICAM-1 is considered essential by scientists for a
common cold cure. Eby's ColdCure zinc lozenges use the
only formulation ever demonstrated in the history of common cold research to
reduce dramatically the duration and severity of all common cold symptoms in
three independent, non-company, double-blind, clinical trials published in
peer reviewed medical journals. His 4-gram peppermint flavored ColdCure zinc
lozenges release 14.0 mg zinc ions - and they are pleasant tasting. See these journal articles for evidence
of efficacy: Family-size bottles of these zinc
lozenges are inexpensively priced at US $28.00 for a bottle of 100 lozenges,
while cases of 12 bottles (as gifts to your friends, relatives and
co-workers) are only $144.00. Place your order for Eby's ColdCure zinc
lozenges now for your next common cold (you know it's going to occur) using
our exclusive ORDER FORM. View Eby's ColdCure zinc lozenge bottle
label here. If you want to know why there are no
other zinc lozenges that can cure the common cold, it is a matter of his patents! George Eby patented
all of the zinc lozenge formulations that would shorten or cure common colds,
thus all of the other zinc lozenges in stores use non-infringing formulas
that can not cure common colds.
A cure for the common cold? No way! You
have been thoroughly indoctrinated to know there is no such thing! Right?
There are too many rhinovirus types; and too many other excuses have been
thrown at you by everyone from your mother to government research scientists.
It's just unthinkable. Not to belabor the point, see what Eby's ColdCure zinc
lozenges with their zinc ion availability (ZIA) of 100 do to reduce the average duration of
common colds by 7 days, and to reduce
the severity of all common cold symptoms to the point that very few
people have common cold symptoms of any consequence after the third day. They
do it by taking advantage of the inhibitor effects of ionic zinc on
intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), by antiviral means and other
means described in this website. What does the ZIA of zinc lozenges
mean? Strength! Power! Efficacy! The strength of zinc lozenge in its ability
to shorten common colds, or terminate incipient common colds is directly
related to the ZIA of the lozenges. A zinc lozenge having a strong ZIA value
will release hydrated zinc ions (Zn2+)
at physiologic pH evinced by oral drying (astringency) and major reduction in
duration of common colds. Zinc lozenges having a ZIA value of 100 are strong
enough to terminate incipient common colds in less than a day or reduce the
average duration of existing common colds by a week. They are pleasant
tasting, flavor stable and cause no objectionable aftertaste. Zn2+ ions at physiologic pH are powerful - but totally
natural - antirhinoviral agents, ICAM-1 inhibitors, immune system aids,
interferon inducers, cell plasma/membrane pore closing agents,
anti-inflammatory agents, antioxidants, protease inhibitors, and strong
drying agents. On the other hand, other
zinc lozenges having a zero or low ZIA value do not release zinc ions and are
not astringent. Zinc lozenges with low positive ZIA values are not very
useful and may not be sufficiently astringent to notice. Zinc lozenges having
a negative ZIA value (ZnLN-) also are not astringent, often taste
acidic and may worsen common colds. It is the lozenge ZIA value -- not the
total amount of zinc -- that results in duration changes in common colds.
These non astringent, ineffective zinc lozenges are the type found in stores
and elsewhere. See these tragic products in the table of http://zinc-lozenges.com. Astringency is the mouth's way of
detecting ionic zinc. Compare the astringency of other zinc lozenges with
Eby's ColdCure zinc lozenges and use the most astringent zinc lozenges you
can find (Eby's ColdCure) for maximum benefit. Purchase Eby's ColdCure zinc
lozenges before you develop a common cold and start use as soon at the
first indication of common cold coming on. Treating a common cold very early
may terminate the common cold in less than a day. Why? Viral replication
inhibition and ICAM-1 inhibition by ionic zinc occurs best during the first
signs of a common cold symptom! Eby's ColdCure zinc lozenges used in the
early stage of a common cold have a much better chance of terminating a
common cold in a day than if their use is started after viral damage has
occurred. Young people experience more common
colds and worse common colds, and often give them to their parents. If you wait
until you, or your loved ones, develop a common cold, it will be too late to
take best advantage of the amazing power of these zinc lozenges
although they will still be of significant value. Allergy
Season?
Zinc
lozenges are fabulous for seasonal allergies too! Usually only one or two
lozenges are needed per day for complete nasal relief. Check out this annual allergy
chart for more information about what allergens are in the air on a
seasonal basis. The Flu?
Remember, flu (influenza) is totally
different from common colds and allergies and may require special medication from a physician.
George Eby's
ColdCure.com web site abides by the Health on the Internet Code of Conduct
for Medical and Health Websites. George Eby, the inventor of Eby'sTM
ColdCure Zinc Lozenges and web master, does not hold himself to the public to
be a physician, and he provides information in this site only as a public
service, and not as medical advice which can be given only by a licensed
physician. George Eby and Eby Pharma, LLC are not responsible for misuse of
zinc or ColdCureTM lozenges or any other item sold through this
facility. All information presented in this web site is provided for
educational purposes only. The only warranties made in this web site are all
information is: (a) believed to be given with full and open disclosure, (b)
believed to be accurate, truthful, and unbiased, and (c) believed to adhere
to the © 1995 - 2008 All
rights reserved. Permission is granted to all to make paper copies for fair
use, including evaluation, research, and teaching purposes if text is
maintained in its original context and if proper copyright credit is given.
Written permission is required to publish for profit, or make available for
sale copyrighted material from this site. Under current Last Updated: March 20,
2008
Questions? Contact him.
Questions, kudos, complaints and comments are always welcome. George Eby
|
|
Published by:
Publications Division
George Eby Research
Copyright (c) 1994 by George A. Eby
All rights reserved. With the exception of factual figures presented, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without prior written permission from the author. Absolutely no unauthorized reproduction is allowed under penalty of law.
As long as the source is properly credited, the publisher gives permission
to all to reproduce figures within this publication, as most technical figures
are equated with unadorned facts and they -- and most other technical figures
and support data regardless of source -- are not copyrightable under existing
United States case law.
Copyright (c) 1994 by Charles A. Pasternak - Foreword
Copyright (c) 1994 by David A. J. Tyrrell - Foreword
Copyright (c) 1994 by Widad Al-Nakib - Foreword
Copyrights for articles in Appendix:
Copyright (c) 1993 American Society for Microbiology, "Reduction in Duration of Common Colds by Zinc Gluconate Lozenges in a Double-Blind Study." (used with permission)
Copyright (c) 1993 British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, "Prophylaxis and Treatment of Rhinovirus Colds with Zinc Gluconate Lozenges." (used with permission)
Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 93-090841
ISBN: 0-9638967-0-9
Printed in
First edition, first printing: February 14, 1994,
Internet publication: December 3, 2002
Dedicated to
my daugther,
Karen Lynn Eby
and
serendipity
· Chapter
1. Introduction - page 1
· Seasonal
Variation in Etiologic Agents
· New
Evidence for Rhinoviruses as Principal Cause of Colds
· Overview
of Common Cold Treatments
· Introduction
of Zinc Gluconate Lozenges
· Calculating
Availability of Zn2+ Ions
· Consideration
of Body Acid-Base Balance
· Chapter
2. In Vitro Effects Of Zn2+
Ions - page 9
· Antiviral
Effects of Zinc Ions
· Antibacterial
and Antifungal Activity
· Non-Specific
Membrane Protection
· Histamine
or Kinins in Colds?
· Zinc,
Stress, and Common Colds
· Overview
of Effects of Zn2+ Ions in
Common Cold Therapy
· Chapter
3. Zinc Lozenge Method of Treating Colds - page 25
· Nasal
Administration and Systemic Absorption
· Zinc
Ion Availability (ZIA) Values
· Mathematics
Of Common Cold Duration
· Chapter
4. Effects of Zinc Lozenges on Duration of Common Colds page - 33
· Chapter
5. Central Finding of Linear Relation between ZIA and Efficacy - page 63
· Projection
of Negative ZIA Values
· Concession
to Taste Through Use of a Double Loading Dose
· Zn2+ Ions and Zinc Compound Molar
Concentration with ZIA Values
· Chapter
6. Effects of Flavor-Masking on Efficacy - page 71
· Various
Non-Chelating Flavor Masks
· Low
ZIA Value for 5-Gram Zinc Gluconate Lozenge
· Search
for Efficacy and Pleasant Taste
· Chapter
7. Zinc Acetate Lozenges, Successor to Zinc Gluconate Lozenges - page 77
· Zinc
Acetate as Source of Zn2+Ions
· Eliminating
Astringency from Zinc Lozenges
· Chapter
8. Zinc Biochemistry - page 88
· Recent
Human Safety and Toxicologic Data
· Lack
of Toxicity in Common Cold Studies
· Possible
Adverse Effect in Pregnancy
· Industrial
Safety and Material Safety Data Sheet for Zinc Acetate
· Concluding
Comments on Toxicity
· Chapter
9. Conclusions and Recommendations - page 97
· Recommended
Standard Zinc Acetate Lozenge Formulation
· Recommended
Advanced Design Zinc Acetate Lozenge Formulation
· Changes
in Formulation Allowable
· Manufacturing
Variables Affecting ZIA
· Importance
of Placebo Matching
· Differences
in Lozenge Taste Perception in Well and Ill Volunteers
· Placebo
Lozenge Formula Considerations
· Recommended
Placebo Lozenge Formula
· Recommended
Clinical Trial Protocols
· Expected
Clinical Results from Advanced Design Lozenges
· Expected
Side Effects and Contraindications
· Use
of Zinc Acetate Lozenges to Treat Upper Respiratory Allergy
· Use
of Zinc Acetate Lozenges to Treat Mononucleosis
· Figure
1. Distribution of zinc ionic species in the Zn2+ and gluconic acid system
· Figure
3. Duration of common colds in ZIA 100 zinc gluconate- and placebo-treated
groups
· Figure
4. Average total severity of colds in ZIA 100 zinc gluconate- and
placebo-treated groups
· Figure
5. Daily clinical score of ZIA 43.9 zinc gluconate- and placebo-treated groups
· Figure
7. Duration of common colds using bitter ZIA 25 zinc gluconate and placebo
· Figure
8. Effect of very low dosage ZIA 13.4 zinc gluconate and placebo
· Figure
9. Effect of ZIA 0 zinc orotate and placebo lozenges and zinc gluconate nasal
spray
· Figure
10. Estimated effect of ZIA 0 zinc aspartate and placebo lozenges
· Figure
11. Mole fraction Zn2+ species
versus pH for solution with Zn2+
and excess citric acid (H3L)
· Figure
12. Mole fraction for equimolar zinc and citric acid at 10 mMol
· Figure
13. Estimated effect of ZIA -12.5 zinc gluconate-citrate and placebo lozenges
· Figure
14. Estimated effect of ZIA -54 zinc acetate- tartarate-carbonate lozenges and
placebo
· Figure
16. Estimated effect of zinc gluconate-glycine and placebo on duration of colds
· Figure
17. Effect of pretreatment cold duration for zinc gluconate-glycine treated
sub-groups
· Figure
20. Concentration of Zn2+ ion
in the zinc and acetate system by pH
· Figure
21. Effect of compressive force upon dissolution times
· Figure
22. Effect of compressive force upon ZIA values
· Figure
23. Effect of zinc content on ZIA and Zn2+
mMol concentration
· Figure
24. Relationship of lozenge zinc content to saliva production.
· Figure
25. Relationship of lozenge zinc content to lozenge dissolution rate
· Figure
26. Effect of force applied to lozenge thickness
· Figure 27. Expected effect of ZIA 100
and ZIA 400 lozenges
· Table
1. Characteristics of 80 subjects
· Table
2. Number of patients reporting common cold symptoms at various times
· Table
3. Average severity of 10 common cold symptoms at various times
· Table
4. Side effects and complaints
· Table
5. 11.5-mg zinc lozenge formulation tested by McNeil Consumer Products Company
· Table
6. Examples of citric acid - sodium bicarbonate in effervescent formulations
from Mohrle
· Table
7. ZIA factors (zinc, fraction Zn2+,
dissolution times, doses per day and saliva generated)
· Table
8. Study lozenges, ZIA values, electronic charge, and reduction in duration of
colds.
· Table
9. Lozenge taste, salivary pH, near aftertaste and overnight aftertaste
· Table
10. Zinc2+ ion and zinc
compound salivary molar concentration compared with ZIA values
· Table
12. Medicinal ingredients for incorporation into common cold lozenge
· Table
13. Advanced design 15 mg zinc (zinc acetate) lozenge characteristics (3.5 and
5.0 gram)
· Table
15. Source and cost of zinc acetate lozenge ingredients
· Table 16. Possible daily intake of zinc
in milligrams per kilogram of body weight
Today, zinc supplements are found on the health-food shelves of pharmacies and drug stores, alongside ginseng, yeast extract, and oil of wintergreen. But let us not forget that today's alternative or homeopathic medicine -- complementary is probably a better word -- is tomorrow's orthodox medicine. There are plenty of examples to illustrate this point: from the use of digitalis to prevent heart attack or quinine to prevent malaria, to the technique of vaccination to prevent infectious disease. The latter is a particularly striking example. Three centuries ago the practice of variolation (inhaling the pus from a small-pox victim to protect oneself against the onset of this disfiguring disease) was not so much an old wives' tale as a young mistress's tale: having been used for centuries earlier by the Chinese, it was prescribed for the Circassian maidens who inhabited the sultan's seraglio in the Ottoman Empire to protect their luscious skins. Today, following on from the success story of the small-pox vaccine, billions of dollars are being spent by the most respected research establishments of the world to develop vaccines against malaria, influenza, HIV, and a host of other infectious agents. If we had a vaccine against rhinoviruses, we might not need to fight the common cold with Zn2+ ions from zinc lozenges.
The trouble with zinc is that, like vitamin C, it is present in most of our diets in quantities sufficient to prevent major deficiency disease (rare enough, anyway, in the case of zinc). Why should we take more? The answer lies in the way in which vitamins and other essential nutrients such as iron, copper, zinc, or iodine work: with the possible exception of iodine, whose function seems to be confined to the thyroid gland, most other vitamins and nutrients play a role in practically every tissue of the body. For example, while the dietary intake of vitamin C or zinc by healthy people of the Western world may be sufficient to prevent scurvy or the skin disease of Acrodermatitis enteropathica, respectively, this does not mean that a little bit extra may not be beneficial in fighting a number of different infectious diseases. For not only do vitamin C and zinc function in many different tissues, but the natures of those functions are manifold. Zinc, for example, is required for dozens of quite different molecular interactions within cells: it is easy to envisage that at a particular dietary intake most of these work normally, but one or two are below par; this would place the individual at risk for the onset of disease. Moreover, the imposition of a particular stress such as a viral infection places additional demands on certain cells within the body, and no one should be surprised that a higher concentration than normal of a critical nutrient such as zinc turns out to be beneficial.
George Eby is a courageous man. He is neither
scientist nor physician, yet he has battled with the medical establishment and
pharmaceutical companies for a decade to persuade them to take seriously his
proposal regarding throat lozenges releasing Zn2+ ions as an effective treatment for common colds. There
is room in all walks of life for astute and intelligent men like George Eby:
the challenge from inquiring and critical laymen is often immensely beneficial
to scientists and physicians set in their ways. And who in the United States
can doubt the contributions made by their most eminent layman -- President
Thomas Jefferson? While George Eby's suggestion 15 years ago that his
hospitalized leukemic daughter be given additional nutrients that included zinc
may have not been as dramatic as the decision 250 years ago of Lady Mary Worley
Montague -- wife of the British Envoy in Constantinople -- to administer a
small dose of live small pox to her son to protect him against subsequent
exposure, George Eby may nevertheless have stumbled onto more than one novel
form of therapy using zinc. Read what follows and judge for yourself.
Charles A. Pasternak, Ph.D., D.Sc., Hon M.D.
Professor of Biochemistry
University of London at
St George's Hospital Medical School
London (UK)
and
Director of the Oxford International
Biomedical Centre
Some years ago George Eby noted that using zinc gluconate lozenges apparently benefited his daughter's colds, so he organized a clinical trial to test the idea. The results showed that such treatment improved the outcome. Although the trial did have some faults, we conducted a further test of his formulation in volunteers given experimental colds at the Common Cold Unit at Salisbury. The results of the test seemed to show benefit if the lozenges were given before or during the cold, yet similar studies at the excellent unit at the University of Virginia failed to confirm our findings.
Mr. Eby has taken expert advice and investigated the possibility that it isn't merely the presence of zinc in the lozenge which matters, but the amount and duration of the Zn2+ ions released that determines whether there is an effect or not. He has combined his own studies of the characteristics of the formulations used with the published results of trials in a type of meta-analysis. It is not possible to present the amount of benefit in formally the same terms, but the results do support his case that the differences might be due to the release characteristics of the Zn2+ ions.
Of course this doesn't settle the problem. It has been suggested that our trials failed to control adequately for the volunteers guessing whether they had active or placebo lozenges, and so produced a spurious positive result. There is also the problem that there is no evidence that Zn2+ ions actually reach the infected mucous membranes in the nose; however, in a sense that does not matter as there are many examples of active treatments being discovered when there was no evidence of how they worked.
It is therefore worthwhile keeping the debate open in spite of the negative results in some trials and other much less plausible claims for benefits from zinc. This book helps in that debate by bringing together summaries of the biology of zinc, the results of the trials in common colds and the results of the analyses of the formulations used. The texts of original papers are also there to help the careful reader.
I welcome this book. The best result of its publication would be at least one vigorous trial using zinc lozenges formulated with precisely the characteristics of those used and recommended by Mr. Eby, and with vigorous monitoring of the double-blind precautions and the clinical course of the patients.
David A. J. Tyrrell, M.D.,
retired Director Common Cold Unit
British Medical Research Council,
Salisbury (UK)
and currently with the:
British Medical Research Council
AIDS Directed Programme Public Health Laboratory Service
Centre for Applied Microbiology and Research
Porton Down, Salisbury, UK
In 1994, there continues to be a debate as to the efficacy of zinc in the prevention and/or treatment of the common cold. The initial studies conducted by Eby et al (1984) did suggest some efficacy although the trials were not perhaps as vigorously controlled as they should have been. We conducted double blind placebo-controlled studies at the MRC Common Cold Unit in Salisbury and found some benefit if the lozenges were given just before or after the onset of colds. One of the main criticisms of our trials was that there was not a sufficient number of volunteers in the second phase of the study which was the treatment with zinc lozenges. Studies in the USA and Australia however, failed to confirm these findings. This book attempts to review the role of zinc lozenges in the prevention and treatment of the common cold and summarizes the biology of zinc. I, like David Tyrrell, therefore welcome this book and hope that it would continue to debate the subject further with the hope that it may encourage further controlled trials.
Widad Al-Nakib, MA FRCPath PhD
Principal Investigator, Common cold Unit
British Medical Research Council CCU
currently at Advanced Pathology Services
London UK
In an effort to provide a unifying hypothesis, this handbook analyzes all reports of zinc lozenge for common cold research reported since publication of my 1984 article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy which documented a way of reducing the average duration of common colds by seven days using zinc gluconate lozenges. Common colds are mostly caused by rhinoviruses, and zinc gluconate is a good source of Zn2+ ions which are antirhinoviral.
The story has been told around the world of how in 1979 my leukemic 3-year old daughter, Karen, started a revolution. She had refused to swallow her 50-mg zinc supplement because she had a severe common cold. Instead, she allowed the zinc gluconate tablet to dissolve slowly in her mouth during an afternoon nap, resulting in the termination of her cold within several hours -- without further treatment or relapse. After this serendipitous discovery, I found similar results in other family members, friends, and co-workers.
Swallowed tablets, nasal ointments, nasal sprays, and nose drops were also tested. Nose drops were expected to work better than lozenges; however, no reduction in duration of common colds was observed. The dichotomy was difficult to understand, as colds are an infection of the nose, not the mouth. In retrospect, these findings are consistent with published literature dating from 1901 on zinc treatment of nasal catarrh via the nasal route as a short-lived nasal decongestant.
Why? A biologically closed electric circuit (BCEC) between the mouth and nose controls local movement of metallic ions. Of the many BCECs described in 1984 by Björn E. W. Nordenström, the mouth-nose BCEC is the most readily observable.
Over a two-year experimental period from 1979 to 1981, I formalized what I thought to be the best protocol for using zinc gluconate lozenges. William W. Halcomb (a general practice physician and allergist now in Mesa, Arizona), Donald R. Davis (a nutrition scientist who worked for National Academy of Science member Roger J. Williams [deceased] at the Clayton Biochemical Institute Foundation at the University of Texas at Austin), and I conducted the original double-blind study using slow-dissolving zinc gluconate tablets -- as lozenges -- in the fall of 1981 to treat wild common colds.
The results showed the expected efficacy. Zinc gluconate lozenges reduced the average duration of common colds by seven days, with exceptionally strong statistical significance from the first few hours, again without relapse of colds. Our article caused others to attempt to replicate our findings.
In 1984, the Medical-Scientific Director of RBS Pharma-Milan (now part of Rôhne-Poulenc Pharma, Italia, S. P. A.), Rinaldo Pellegrini sought my team's advice on how to compound zinc gluconate lozenges. By that time, my team had completed a no-effect zinc orotate (non-ionizable) lozenge for common colds study. On the basis of the conflicting zinc gluconate and zinc orotate results, we recommended avoidance of zinc chelators in lozenges. The pleasant-tasting, fructose-based RBS Pharma lozenges were tested on experimental colds by David A. J. Tyrrell and co-workers at the Great Britain Medical Research Council (MRC) Common Cold Unit. Analysis of the data from the MRC study showed nasal secretions essentially returned to normal in the zinc-treated group by day 4, while colds in the placebo-treated group continued. Analysis of mean clinical scores showed colds were essentially absent in six days with zinc treatment. Compared to the historic average of 10.8 days for untreated colds, a reduction of 4.8 days in common cold duration occurred. For the first time, an internationally recognized common cold research group verified a clinical treatment to shorten common cold symptoms. The positive results were discomfiting to the MRC scientists, because the operative mechanism remained elusive.
The issue became confounded when other studies came up with different findings from the Texas and MRC studies. Some zinc gluconate lozenges had objectionable taste and long-lasting aftertaste, seriously impairing patient compliance. Zinc gluconate developed a reputation for being bitter, and lozenges needed flavor-masking. Actually, bitterness results only when zinc gluconate is combined with dextrose. Zinc gluconate in fructose -- as in the MRC lozenges -- tastes pleasant when flavored and has a mild aftertaste. The wide disagreement between studies caused researchers to assume the positive findings to be faulty. In 1988, letters to the editor of Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy suggested differences in stability constants as being responsible for failures. The letters produced both insightful, and misleading information.
In apparent defense of citric acid flavor-masked zinc gluconate lozenge work, one letter asserted zinc gluconate-citrate lozenges produced a salivary pH of 2.3 (stomach acid pH), contending one hundred percent of the zinc was released as Zn2+ ions.
Realizing the improbability of a salivary 2.3 pH from use of the zinc gluconate-citrate lozenges and the improbability of availability of Zn2+ ions at physiologic pH, Guy Berthon, Director of Research at INSERM Unit 305 in Toulouse, France, entered the fray. One responsibility of INSERM Unit 305 is to determine the bioavailability of drugs at physiological pH 7.4, the only relevant pH for antivirals and many other chemotherapeutic agents. Determination of bioavailability is a complex and difficult effort involving solution chemistry. After a close collaboration between Guy Berthon and myself from 1988 to 1993, a report was produced thoroughly examining bioavailability of Zn2+ ions from the conflicting zinc lozenge articles. The resulting report, -- The "Zinc Lozenge and Common Cold Story" -- is published separately by Marcel Dekker, Inc. in Handbook of Metal-Ligand Interactions in Biological Fluids, edited by Guy Berthon. We all owe Guy Berthon our gratitude. Had he not intervened, the work would have died, and I would have gone on to do something else, disillusioned and disappointed. Worse, an effective cure to the common cold would have been buried and probably never resurrected.
Presentation of comprehensive solution chemistry data is part of the analysis of the various conflicting reports in this handbook. Guy Berthon's research demonstrated Zn2+ ions were available at physiologic pH